 |


|
SUBSCRIBE to the e-mail edition of Hannibal.net.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Home Local News
Web posted
April 16, 2005
New Prop 36 proposal to surface
By DANNY HENLEY
Of the Courier-Post
Larry Craig was still wearing his Proposition 36 lapel button at Friday's Hannibal Area Chamber of Commerce Noonday Luncheon. His button apparently will not be going out of style anytime soon, as Craig indicated voters will likely be asked to consider another Proposition 36 proposal later this year.
After thanking members of the chamber for their support of the April 5 ballot issue, Craig indicated another proposal could appear before voters in November.
Craig did not indicate what revisions to the original Proposition 36 are under consideration by the U.S. Highway 36-Interstate 72 Corridor Transportation Corporation.
"Prior to the (April 5) election, we did not have a Plan B," said Craig. "We are now working on Plan B."
According to Craig, details of the revised proposal could be ready for release within the next two or three weeks.
The original Proposition 36 asked voters in Marion, Ralls, Monroe, Shelby and Macon counties to approve the implementation of a half-cent sales tax for 15 years, authority to create a transportation development district and overall approval of the project, which would see U.S. 36 expanded to four lanes from just west of Hannibal to Macon.
In return, the Missouri Department of Transportation would have matched the $50 million generated locally by the sales tax, with $86 million. In addition, MoDOT promised to complete the highway by Dec. 31, 2009, or reduce the local share by $10 million.
MoDOT's proposal to pick up more than half the project's cost was a result of Amendment 3's passage in Missouri last November, which ceases the diversion of highway funds to other departments. The $1.3 billion in bond financing generated by Amendment 3's passage will be gone in November. It is scheduled to be divided up among other priority projects throughout Missouri at the May meeting of the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission.
Despite receiving strong support in the five-county area, Proposition 36 went down to defeat when it was rejected by voters in Ralls County.
|
 |
 |

|
 |
 |

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

|
 |
 |

|



|
 |
 |

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

|
 |
 |

|













|
 |